🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding that remarks delivered by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz in the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of disappointment was appropriate. Instead, he brought up the ongoing absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

We all enjoy a storyline, myself included. But really. Suppose the American defeated the legend for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, who he has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven major titles (and the Spaniard went on to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the next round). He stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually liked his path, because it presented the chance to defeat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. He is well justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final who else sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and sustained success

Fritz, 28, is ranked number four in the global rankings entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that is as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of ranking points away. His elite delivery and powerful strength on each front side and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to dispose of the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently helpless. The past few years has witnessed the curious rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and grace of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and playing a drop shot against him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential.

The American has achieved a number of significant, improbable advancements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was sniffing the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing drought of US male players winning major titles when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s performance in that very last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a few championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz creating numerous chances to break. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the brink of frustration. When he eventually did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately played a horrendous game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and compelled him to use excessive energy to win it. Facing match points in the last game, his first serve floated to the sky. He prolonged the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It was not a collapse, I didn’t think, only a result of needing to hit too many second serves.

The match was quite compelling proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any version of Djokovic, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired enough experience and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an asset to the tour regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in press conferences, exceeding virtually everyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not just express how he feels or the tactic he felt decided a contest, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Since Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it forever if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is actually extremely unlikely for everybody else. {