🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he endured defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, the coach took on the executive and seems to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Over System & Philosophy

For example, it was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – simply operate at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power In the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later bin him for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.